Tuesday, September 15$199late booking, seats still openBook a seat
← All guides

Zapier or Make: which should a non-technical person use?

Start with Zapier if you have never automated anything. Its free plan gives 100 tasks a month and two-step workflows only ([zapier.com/pricing](https://zapier.com/pricing), September 2026). Make's free plan gives 1,000 credits, 2 active scenarios and a 15-minute minimum interval ([make.com/en/pricing](https://www.make.com/en/pricing)) — more volume, harder canvas. Move to Make when Zapier's per-task cost outgrows your budget.

Verified free-tier limits, side by side

Both figures below come from the vendors' own pricing pages and help centres, checked 2–3 September 2026.

Zapier Free Make Free
Monthly allowance 100 tasks (help.zapier.com) 1,000 credits (make.com/en/pricing)
Workflow shape Two-step only: "one trigger and one action" (help.zapier.com) Unlimited steps per scenario
How many workflows Unlimited Zaps (help.zapier.com) 2 active scenarios (make.com/en/pricing)
Minimum check interval 15 minutes (help.zapier.com) 15 minutes (make.com/en/pricing)
Users Single user (help.zapier.com) Single user
Premium apps Excluded, paid plans only (help.zapier.com) No premium-app tier
Webhooks No — a premium app (help.zapier.com) Yes
Other free limits 2,500 table records, 10 form pages (help.zapier.com) 7-day execution log, 5 MB max file (make.com/en/pricing)
Time limit None "No time limit on the Free plan" (make.com/en/pricing)

Both numbers in the brief check out. Zapier free is 100 tasks and two-step. Make free is 1,000 credits, 2 active scenarios, 15-minute interval.

Full comparison, including paid tiers

Zapier Make
App integrations "10047+ apps" (zapier.com/apps) 3,000+ apps (make.com/en/pricing)
Entry paid plan Professional, $19.99/mo annual or $29.99/mo monthly, 750 tasks (zapier.com/pricing) Core, $9/mo monthly or about $7.65/mo annual, 10,000 credits (make.com/en/pricing)
Next tier up Professional 1,500 tasks: $39/mo annual, $58.50/mo monthly (zapier.com/pricing) Pro $16/mo, Teams $29/mo, all 10,000 credits base (make.com/en/pricing)
Team plan 25 users, from $69/mo annual for 2,000 tasks (zapier.com/pricing) Teams from $29/mo (make.com/en/pricing)
Fastest polling 2 min on Professional, 1 min on Team (zapier.com/pricing) 1 min on all paid plans (make.com/en/pricing)
Interface Linear list of steps, top to bottom Visual canvas, modules joined by lines
Branching Paths, on Professional and above (zapier.com/pricing) Routers, on every plan including free
Billing unit Task = one successful action step (help.zapier.com) Credit = one module run (help.make.com)
Best-known strength Breadth of app coverage, speed to first working automation Cost per operation, and visual debugging of complex flows

The single biggest cost difference: what counts as billable

This is where most comparisons go wrong, and it decides which tool is cheaper for you.

Zapier charges only for successful actions. Its help center says tasks are used by "all successful action steps" (help.zapier.com). These steps do not use tasks at all, per the same page:

  • All trigger steps. "Zap triggers never use tasks."
  • Filter steps and Paths steps.
  • Formatter, Delay, Looping, Digest and Storage steps.
  • Zapier Tables and Forms steps.
  • Any action step that errors or halts.

Polling an app for new events therefore costs nothing, whatever the frequency (help.zapier.com).

Make charges per module run. Its help center defines an operation as "a single module run to process data or check for new data", and states that "by default, 1 operation equals 1 credit" (help.make.com, help.make.com). Trigger modules consume an operation, though only one per check regardless of how many records come back (help.make.com).

The consequence: Zapier's task allowance goes further per unit than the raw number suggests, because filters, formatting and triggers are free. Make's credit allowance is larger but every module that runs draws on it.

Two honest caveats. I could not confirm from Make's own documentation whether a scheduled poll that finds no new data consumes a credit. Treat that as unverified. Test it on the free plan before you commit. Second, Make replaced "operations" with "credits" as its billing unit in August 2025, converting balances 1:1 (help.make.com). AI-heavy modules can consume more than one credit per run.

A worked example with real figures

A US home services company gets 300 inquiries a month through a web form. The workflow: form submission triggers, a filter drops obvious spam, then three actions — add a row to Google Sheets, post to Slack, send a confirmation email.

On Zapier. The trigger is free. The filter is free. Three successful actions bill three tasks per lead (help.zapier.com). That is 900 tasks a month. The 100-task free plan cannot run this. Professional at 1,500 tasks costs $39.00/month billed annually or $58.50/month billed monthly (zapier.com/pricing). Annual cost: $468.

On Make. The trigger module runs and consumes a credit. The filter sits on the connection and does not run as a module. Three action modules run. Call it four credits per lead, so 1,200 credits a month. The 1,000-credit free plan is just short. Core at 10,000 credits costs $9/month, or about $7.65/month billed annually (make.com/en/pricing). Annual cost: roughly $92.

At this volume Make is around five times cheaper. That gap is the honest reason experienced operators drift to Make. It is also why the answer is not simply "use Zapier".

Now change one thing. Give the same business 40 inquiries a month instead of 300. Zapier bills 120 tasks. Still over the free 100, so Professional at $19.99/month annual for 750 tasks (zapier.com/pricing). Make bills 160 credits and fits inside the free plan, at $0. Make wins again on price — and loses on the hour you spend learning routers.

Which is genuinely easier for a non-technical person

Zapier. Not close, for a first automation.

Zapier's builder is a vertical list. Pick the app that starts it. Pick what happens next. Fill in the boxes. There is nothing to arrange, nothing to connect, no canvas to understand. Most people build a working two-step Zap in under fifteen minutes.

Make's canvas is a genuinely better tool once you can read it. You see the whole flow as a diagram. You can click into any module and inspect the data that passed through it. Debugging a five-step scenario is far clearer than reading a Zapier run history. But you must first learn what a module, a router, an iterator and an aggregator are. Make runs a free Make Academy for exactly this reason. Budget a couple of hours, not fifteen minutes.

There is one more practical difference. Zapier lists over 10,000 app integrations (zapier.com/apps) against Make's 3,000+ (make.com/en/pricing). For a non-technical user, "my app is already in the list" beats any feature. The alternative is building a custom connection. That is exactly the work you were trying to avoid.

Decision tree: pick this one if…

Pick Zapier if:

  • This is your first automation and you want something working today.
  • Your workflow is genuinely simple: something happens, one thing follows.
  • You are under about 100 billable actions a month and want to stay at $0.
  • Your apps are niche and you need the largest integration catalogue.
  • You have colleagues who will need to edit your automations without training.
  • You want a lot of free steps — filters, formatting, delays — that never bill.

Pick Make if:

  • Your volume is high enough that Zapier's task pricing hurts. At 900 tasks a month the gap in the example above was roughly $376 a year.
  • Your workflow branches: different actions for different kinds of inquiry.
  • You handle lists — process every line of an order, every row of a spreadsheet.
  • You need webhooks on a free plan, which Zapier does not offer (help.zapier.com).
  • You have two hours to learn the canvas and will use it repeatedly.
  • You want faster runs cheaply: 1-minute intervals on the $9 Core plan (make.com/en/pricing).

Pick neither yet if:

  • You have not written down the process by hand. Automating an undefined process produces a fast mess.
  • The task happens twice a month. Do it manually.

Where each one stops being enough

Zapier stops being enough when the per-task bill outruns the value. Watch for three signals. Your workflows routinely run five or more actions. You are buying extra task packs. Or your branching has grown too complex to follow in Paths. Note also that free plan users cannot use webhooks or premium apps at all (help.zapier.com), so the free tier is a trial, not a destination.

Make stops being enough in two directions. Downward, when nobody but you can maintain the scenarios — a canvas one person understands is a business risk. Upward, when you need error handling, retries and monitoring a visual builder was never built for. At that point you are looking at custom code or a managed integration service.

Both stop being enough at the same wall: when the automation is making decisions rather than moving data. Moving a form entry into a spreadsheet is automation. Deciding whether to approve a refund is not, and neither tool should be trusted with it unsupervised.

What most comparisons get wrong

They compare 100 tasks to 1,000 operations as if the units matched. They do not. A Zapier task is one successful action, with triggers and filters free (help.zapier.com). A Make credit is any module run, including the trigger (help.make.com). The real ratio depends on how many free-in-Zapier steps your workflow uses.

They say Make is "cheaper" full stop. It is cheaper per unit of work. It is more expensive in your time, and your time is the scarcer resource when you are learning.

They ignore the active-scenario cap. Make's free plan allows 2 active scenarios (make.com/en/pricing) while Zapier's allows unlimited Zaps (help.zapier.com). If you want six small automations running at once, Zapier's free plan is structurally the right shape and Make's is not.

They still say "operations". Make renamed the billing unit to credits in August 2025, at a 1:1 conversion (help.make.com). Any comparison still using the old word has not been rechecked.

Where these figures come from

People also ask

An automation that runs the job and pauses for your approval before sending

Rather do this with someone than read about it?

Automate repetitive tasks with AI is a live two-hour class built on exactly this problem. 25 seats, your own files, and you leave with a setup that does the job by itself and asks you to approve it before anything is sent.

Read next

Can AI answer my customer inquiries for me?

Yes, for the repetitive questions — hours, pricing, order status, returns — if you give it a written source of truth and a clear route to a human.

Can lawyers use ChatGPT and keep client confidentiality?

Yes. ABA Formal Opinion 512, issued 29 July 2024, permits generative AI use under the existing Model Rules.

Can my ChatGPT conversations be subpoenaed?

Yes, and they already have been. In New York Times v. OpenAI, a court ordered OpenAI to produce 20 million de-identified ChatGPT conversations.